Arrington versus Ali on the future of blogging
Posted by Bill Gaffney | March 31st, 2008
NY Times Bits blogger Saul Hansen takes a look at Michael Arrington of TechCrunch and Rafat Ali of Paid Content and their unique approaches to blogging. This debate is more than simply an argument over emotional versus analytical blogging or their specific journalistic style, it sets the framework for how the two see the future.

“The only way to compete with CNet in the long run is to group these writers together. They should be better writers than CNet has because they are all competitive entrepreneurs with a lot of equity at stake.”
- Mike Arrington
Ali offers a slightly different take…
“The big market for us is the trade media. Companies like Reed Elsevier, Nielsen, Incisive and Informa play in this market, not these blogs. If CNet is the only target you can aspire to be, that is selling yourself really short.”
NY Times Bits blogger Saul Hansen takes a look at Michael Arrington of TechCrunch and Rafat Ali of Paid Content and their unique approaches to blogging. This debate is more than simply an argument over emotional versus analytical blogging or their specific journalistic style, it sets the framework for how the two see the future.
![]()
“The only way to compete with CNet in the long run is to group these writers together. They should be better writers than CNet has because they are all competitive entrepreneurs with a lot of equity at stake.”
- Mike Arrington
Ali offers a slightly different take…
“The big market for us is the trade media. Companies like Reed Elsevier, Nielsen, Incisive and Informa play in this market, not these blogs. If CNet is the only target you can aspire to be, that is selling yourself really short.”












